[SRILM User List] Fwd: Fwd: ngram-count
Andreas Stolcke
stolcke at speech.sri.com
Mon Jan 11 08:54:27 PST 2010
On 1/11/2010 5:08 AM, Manuel Alves wrote:
> Hi again.
> What about using the -unk in the ngram-count command?
> The OOVś and the zeroprobs disapear?
>
Please read the FAQ items starting at D6 to understand the handling of
OOVs and zeroprobs, and what -unk does to the model.
Andreas
>
> On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 12:00 PM, Manuel Alves <beleira at gmail.com
> <mailto:beleira at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: *Manuel Alves* <beleira at gmail.com <mailto:beleira at gmail.com>>
> Date: Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 11:49 AM
> Subject: Re: [SRILM User List] Fwd: Fwd: ngram-count
> To: Andreas Stolcke <stolcke at speech.sri.com
> <mailto:stolcke at speech.sri.com>>
>
>
> Hi Andreas.
> The output of the ngram-count was:
> [root at localhost
> Corporas]# ../srilm/bin/i686/ngram-count -order 3 -text
> CETEMPublico1.7 -lm LM
> warning: discount
> coeff 1 is out of range: 1.44451e-17
>
> I dont know if there is any problem with GT discount method.
>
>
> On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 9:52 PM, Andreas Stolcke
> <stolcke at speech.sri.com <mailto:stolcke at speech.sri.com>> wrote:
>
> On 1/8/2010 3:57 AM, Manuel Alves wrote:
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: *Manuel Alves* <beleira at gmail.com
>> <mailto:beleira at gmail.com>>
>> Date: Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 10:40 AM
>> Subject: Re: Fwd: ngram-count
>> To: Andreas Stolcke <stolcke at speech.sri.com
>> <mailto:stolcke at speech.sri.com>>
>>
>>
>> 1. ngram-count -text CETEMPublico1.7 -lm LM
>> 2.I test it in this way:
>> I use the client-server
>> architecture of SRILM
>> SERVER : ngram -lm ../$a
>> -server-port 100 -order 3
>> CLIENT : ngram -use-server
>> 100\@localhost -cache-served-ngrams -ppl $ficheiro -debug 2 2>&1
>> where $ficheiro is this:
>
>>
>>
>> p( observássemos | que ...) = 0 [ -inf ]
>
>> file final.txt: 6 sentences, 126 words, 0 OOVs
>> 6 zeroprobs, logprob= -912.981 ppl= 1.7615e+07 ppl1= 4.05673e+07
>
> It looks to me like everything is working as intended. You
> are getting zeroprobs, but not a large number of them.
> They are low-frequency words (like the one above), so it makes
> sense, since they are probably not contained in the training
> corpus.
>
> The perplexity is quite high, but that could be because of a
> small, or mismatched training corpus. You didn't include the
> output of the ngram-count program, it's possible that the GT
> (default) discounting method reported some problems that are
> not evident from your mail.
>
> One thing to note is that with network-server LMs you don't
> get OOVs, because all words are implicitly added to the
> vocabulary. Consequently, OOVs are counted as zeroprobs
> instead, but both types of tokens are equivalent for
> perplexity computation.
> Still, you could run
> ngram -lm ../$a -order 3 -ppl $ficheiro -debug 2
> just to make sure you're getting the same result.
>
> Andreas
>
>
>> _Manuel Alves. _
>>
>> On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 8:35 PM, Andreas Stolcke
>> <stolcke at speech.sri.com <mailto:stolcke at speech.sri.com>> wrote:
>>
>> On 1/6/2010 10:34 AM, Manuel Alves wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>> From: *Manuel Alves* <beleira at gmail.com
>>> <mailto:beleira at gmail.com>>
>>> Date: Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 6:33 PM
>>> Subject: ngram-count
>>> To: srilm-user at speech.sri.com
>>> <mailto:srilm-user at speech.sri.com>
>>>
>>>
>>> Hi people.
>>> I need help whith ngram-count because i am training a
>>> model but when after i try to use it some test example
>>> he gives me Zeroprobs in the output.
>>> This means that the model is bad trained?
>>> Please answer me.
>>> Best regards,
>>> Manuel Alves.
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> SRILM-User site list
> SRILM-User at speech.sri.com <mailto:SRILM-User at speech.sri.com>
> http://www.speech.sri.com/mailman/listinfo/srilm-user
>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.speech.sri.com/pipermail/srilm-user/attachments/20100111/ab4b4f71/attachment.html>
More information about the SRILM-User
mailing list