order of options to ngram-count
stolcke at speech.sri.com
Fri Nov 2 08:05:31 PDT 2007
In message <B31D0E4E-EB44-4F81-AAC2-17E616D427AF at gmail.com>you wrote:
> My impression is that ngram-count is sensitive to the order of
> options (1.5.4b from yesterday).
> ngram-count -text - order 1 -write unigrams.count # takes up all
> memory, runs forever
You have a typo in the above: "order" instead of "-order".
> ngram-count -order 1 -text - write unigrams.count # finishes up
> quickly in a fraction of memory
> Does the former honor -order 1? What's the rule here -- trailing -
> write is honored anyways? I now stick other flags, such as -tolower,
> in front of -text - .
All SRILM programs are invariant to order of options.
More information about the SRILM-User